Protecting your Peace – Civil injunctions prohibiting harassment

17 Apr

During these trying times it can seem like we will never again interact with anyone outside of our household. Unfortunately for some people, the lockdown results in increased tensions with people outside the home. For instance, neighbour disputes and petty differences with others can take on a heightened meaning during this period of enforced lockdown. When attempts to resolve these difficulties fail, is there any recourse to the Courts?


Depending on the behaviour complained of, there is the option of making an application for a civil injunction restraining individuals from pursuing a course of conduct which amounts to harassment. In practical terms, the type of restrictions placed on the respondent could be a prohibition from approaching the applicant and/or his property. Such an application draws on the statutory power from section 3A of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.


To succeed in such an application, it needs to be shown that the respondent has acted in a way which has caused harassment and which he knows, or ought to have known, amounted to harassment of another, based on the reasonable person test.


Unlike other civil injunctions, such as freezing injunctions, an injunction to protect a person from harassment, does not require an underlying claim. Rather, the application can stand alone in its own right. If the respondent subsequently commits an act in contravention of the injunction, the applicant can then apply to the court, which granted the injunction, for a warrant to arrest the respondent. If ultimately the respondent is found to have breached the order, this is treated as a contempt of court and sentencing options include imprisonment.


The true benefit of obtaining an injunction against harassment is the peace of mind this grants the applicant – knowing that the court has put in place prohibitions against the respondent, prohibitions which if breached can have severe consequences for the respondent.


Article by Alexander Deakin – Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice. Readers may contact clerks@stourchambers.co.uk should they wish formal legal advice on their particular circumstances.

This set comes recommended for its members' expertise in children and matrimonial finance matters. The children cases range across both public and private law work, and include those concerning non-accidental injury, sexual abuse and fabricated illness. On the financial side, the set's barristers demonstrate the ability to act in substantial financial remedies cases as well as Schedule 1 and TOLATA matters.

~ Chambers UK Bar Guide 2020

Specialising in matrimonial finance and children matters. Members appear in the regional courts as well as the High Court and the Court of Appeal. They often act in financial remedy proceedings relating to farms, companies, properties and other assets. In addition they are adept at dealing with serious child care allegations including physical abuse and death.

~ Chambers UK Bar Guide 2019

Latest News

  • 14 May 2020
    Meghan Daniels - Keeping up with the guidance on remote hearings
    Read article
  • 11 May 2020
    Dr Thomas Richardson - What Was He Doing? Vicarious Liability After WM Morrison PLC v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 12
    Read article
  • 07 May 2020
    Sita Cox - To Mediate or not to Mediate, that is the question?
    Read article

Latest Tweets

We are really looking forward to the announcement of our awards today at 12noon - good luck to everyone! @Stilwells_Kent @StourChambers @BrachersLLP @MWSolicitors @keeley_mw @Yetanothermary @AliasPartridge #celebratesuccess #finalists #welldone #awards

Meghan Daniels on Keeping up with the guidance on remote hearings https://www.stourchambers.co.uk/keeping-up-with-the-guidance-on-remote-hearings/ #remotework #remotehearings #virtualcourts #workfromhome #covid19